2002 Hyundai Matrix vs. 2009 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Hyundai Matrix. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Hyundai Matrix would be higher. At 5,652 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (322 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 218 more horse power than 2002 Hyundai Matrix. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2002 Hyundai Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1130 kg more than 2002 Hyundai Matrix. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Hyundai Matrix. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Commander (500 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 356 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Hyundai Matrix. (144 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Hyundai Matrix. 2009 Jeep Commander has automatic transmission and 2002 Hyundai Matrix has manual transmission. 2002 Hyundai Matrix will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Jeep Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Hyundai Matrix | 2009 Jeep Commander | |
| Make | Hyundai | Jeep |
| Model | Matrix | Commander |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1604 cc | 5652 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 322 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 500 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.5 mm | 99.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 90.9 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 2355 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2790 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 78 L |
