2002 Italdesign Buron vs. 1981 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2002 Italdesign Buron is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda Cosmo would be higher.
Because 1981 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Italdesign Buron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Italdesign Buron has automatic transmission and 1981 Mazda Cosmo has manual transmission. 1981 Mazda Cosmo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Italdesign Buron will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Italdesign Buron | 1981 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Italdesign | Mazda |
Model | Buron | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2002 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 120 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |