2002 Jaguar X400 vs. 1952 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2002 Jaguar X400 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 4,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar X400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar X400 (390 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 1952 Jaguar XK. (158 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar X400 should accelerate faster than 1952 Jaguar XK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar X400 weights approximately 505 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar X400 (525 Nm) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Jaguar XK. (290 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar X400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jaguar X400 | 1952 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Jaguar | Jaguar |
Model | X400 | XK |
Year Released | 2002 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 3441 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 525 Nm | 290 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1295 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 69 L | 63 L |