2002 Jaguar X400 vs. 2000 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2002 Jaguar X400 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar X400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar X400 (390 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 267 more horse power than 2000 Mercury Cougar. (123 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar X400 should accelerate faster than 2000 Mercury Cougar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar X400 weights approximately 490 kg more than 2000 Mercury Cougar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar X400 (525 Nm) has 349 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mercury Cougar. (176 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar X400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mercury Cougar.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Jaguar X400 | 2000 Mercury Cougar | |
| Make | Jaguar | Mercury |
| Model | X400 | Cougar |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4196 cc | 1983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 525 Nm | 176 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1310 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2710 mm |
