2002 Jaguar X400 vs. 2000 Opel Omega
To start off, 2002 Jaguar X400 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Opel Omega would be higher. At 4,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar X400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar X400 (390 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 2000 Opel Omega. (218 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar X400 should accelerate faster than 2000 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar X400 weights approximately 90 kg more than 2000 Opel Omega. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar X400 (525 Nm) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Opel Omega. (290 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar X400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Jaguar X400 | 2000 Opel Omega | |
| Make | Jaguar | Opel |
| Model | X400 | Omega |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4196 cc | 3175 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 218 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 525 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1710 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 69 L | 75 L |
