2002 Jaguar X400 vs. 2004 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Renault Clio is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar X400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar X400 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar X400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar X400 (390 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 2004 Renault Clio. (251 HP @ 7150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar X400 should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar X400 weights approximately 384 kg more than 2004 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar X400 (525 Nm) has 225 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Clio. (300 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar X400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Clio. 2002 Jaguar X400 has automatic transmission and 2004 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2004 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Jaguar X400 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Jaguar X400 | 2004 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Jaguar | Renault |
| Model | X400 | Clio |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4196 cc | 2946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 251 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7150 RPM |
| Torque | 525 Nm | 300 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1416 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 69 L | 60 L |
