2002 Jaguar X400 vs. 2008 Mazda 5
To start off, 2008 Mazda 5 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar X400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar X400 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar X400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar X400 (390 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 272 more horse power than 2008 Mazda 5. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar X400 should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar X400 weights approximately 325 kg more than 2008 Mazda 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar X400 (525 Nm) has 360 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 5. (165 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar X400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 5. 2002 Jaguar X400 has automatic transmission and 2008 Mazda 5 has manual transmission. 2008 Mazda 5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Jaguar X400 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Jaguar X400 | 2008 Mazda 5 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
| Model | X400 | 5 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4196 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 525 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1475 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 69 L | 60 L |
