2002 Jaguar X400 vs. 2008 Mazda 6
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar X400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar X400 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar X400 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar X400 weights approximately 416 kg more than 2008 Mazda 6.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar X400 (525 Nm) has 318 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 6. (207 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar X400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Jaguar X400 | 2008 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
| Model | X400 | 6 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4196 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 525 Nm | 207 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1384 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 69 L | 64 L |
