2002 Jaguar X400 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar X400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar X400 would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar X400 (390 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche. (310 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar X400 should accelerate faster than 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche weights approximately 400 kg more than 2002 Jaguar X400.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar X400 (525 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche. (454 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar X400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Jaguar X400 | 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche | |
| Make | Jaguar | Chevrolet |
| Model | X400 | Avalanche |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4196 cc | 5300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 310 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 525 Nm | 454 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 2200 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 3310 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 69 L | 117 L |
