2002 Jaguar X400 vs. 2010 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2010 Dodge Dakota is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar X400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar X400 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar X400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar X400 (390 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 2010 Dodge Dakota. (207 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar X400 should accelerate faster than 2010 Dodge Dakota.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar X400 (525 Nm) has 289 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Dodge Dakota. (236 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar X400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Dodge Dakota. 2002 Jaguar X400 has automatic transmission and 2010 Dodge Dakota has manual transmission. 2010 Dodge Dakota will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Jaguar X400 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Jaguar X400 | 2010 Dodge Dakota | |
| Make | Jaguar | Dodge |
| Model | X400 | Dakota |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4196 cc | 3701 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 525 Nm | 236 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 3340 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 69 L | 83 L |
