2002 Jaguar X400 vs. 2010 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2010 Jeep Commander is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar X400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar X400 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar X400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar X400 (390 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 2010 Jeep Commander. (210 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar X400 should accelerate faster than 2010 Jeep Commander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar X400 weights approximately 407 kg more than 2010 Jeep Commander. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar X400 (525 Nm) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Jeep Commander. (320 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar X400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Jeep Commander.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jaguar X400 | 2010 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Jaguar | Jeep |
Model | X400 | Commander |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 3701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 525 Nm | 320 Nm |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1393 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 69 L | 80 L |