2002 Jaguar X400 vs. 2010 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2010 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar X400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar X400 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar X400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar X400 (390 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 2010 Mazda CX-9. (273 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar X400 should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda CX-9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 166 kg more than 2002 Jaguar X400.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar X400 (525 Nm) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda CX-9. (366 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar X400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda CX-9.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jaguar X400 | 2010 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | X400 | CX-9 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 525 Nm | 366 Nm |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1966 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2875 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 69 L | 76 L |