2002 Jaguar X400 vs. 2013 Ford E-Series
To start off, 2013 Ford E-Series is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar X400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar X400 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford E-Series is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar X400 (390 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 2013 Ford E-Series. (252 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar X400 should accelerate faster than 2013 Ford E-Series. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar X400 weights approximately 155 kg more than 2013 Ford E-Series. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar X400 (525 Nm) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Ford E-Series. (387 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar X400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Ford E-Series.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Jaguar X400 | 2013 Ford E-Series | |
| Make | Jaguar | Ford |
| Model | X400 | E-Series |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4196 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 252 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 525 Nm | 387 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 4-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 25 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1645 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 3505 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 69 L | 150 L |
