2002 Jaguar XJ vs. 1961 Skoda 1200
To start off, 2002 Jaguar XJ is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Skoda 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Skoda 1200 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJ (301 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 257 more horse power than 1961 Skoda 1200. (44 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1961 Skoda 1200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 790 kg more than 1961 Skoda 1200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJ (541 Nm) has 457 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Skoda 1200. (84 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Skoda 1200.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Jaguar XJ | 1961 Skoda 1200 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Skoda |
| Model | XJ | 1200 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4196 cc | 1219 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 541 Nm | 84 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1010 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2690 mm |
