2002 Jaguar XJ vs. 1963 Lotus Elite
To start off, 2002 Jaguar XJ is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 3,248 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJ (240 HP @ 6350 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Elite. (83 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 1130 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jaguar XJ | 1963 Lotus Elite | |
Make | Jaguar | Lotus |
Model | XJ | Elite |
Year Released | 2002 | 1963 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3248 cc | 1216 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 6350 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1180 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2240 mm |