2002 Jaguar XJ vs. 1963 MG 1100
To start off, 2002 Jaguar XJ is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 MG 1100 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJ (301 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 248 more horse power than 1963 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1963 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 975 kg more than 1963 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 MG 1100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJ (541 Nm) has 458 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 MG 1100. (83 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jaguar XJ | 1963 MG 1100 | |
Make | Jaguar | MG |
Model | XJ | 1100 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 541 Nm | 83 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 825 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2380 mm |