2002 Jaguar XJ vs. 1973 Triumph Spitfire
To start off, 2002 Jaguar XJ is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Triumph Spitfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Triumph Spitfire would be higher. At 3,248 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJ (240 HP @ 6350 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 1973 Triumph Spitfire. (62 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1973 Triumph Spitfire. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 930 kg more than 1973 Triumph Spitfire. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJ (316 Nm @ 4350 RPM) has 223 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Triumph Spitfire. (93 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Triumph Spitfire.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jaguar XJ | 1973 Triumph Spitfire | |
Make | Jaguar | Triumph |
Model | XJ | Spitfire |
Year Released | 2002 | 1973 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3248 cc | 1296 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 6350 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 316 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4350 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 73.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 70 mm | 76 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2110 mm |