2002 Jaguar XJ vs. 1975 Volvo 66
To start off, 2002 Jaguar XJ is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJ (301 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 245 more horse power than 1975 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1975 Volvo 66.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJ (541 Nm) has 447 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Volvo 66. (94 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Volvo 66. 2002 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 1975 Volvo 66 has manual transmission. 1975 Volvo 66 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jaguar XJ | 1975 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
Model | XJ | 66 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 541 Nm | 94 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |