2002 Jaguar XJ vs. 1995 Lada Niva
To start off, 2002 Jaguar XJ is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Lada Niva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Lada Niva would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJ (301 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 1995 Lada Niva. (79 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1995 Lada Niva.
Because 1995 Lada Niva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Jaguar XJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Lada Niva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJ (541 Nm) has 411 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Lada Niva. (130 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Lada Niva. 2002 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 1995 Lada Niva has manual transmission. 1995 Lada Niva will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jaguar XJ | 1995 Lada Niva | |
Make | Jaguar | Lada |
Model | XJ | Niva |
Year Released | 2002 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 1690 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 541 Nm | 130 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2710 mm |