2002 Jaguar XJ vs. 1997 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2002 Jaguar XJ is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Jeep Cherokee would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJ (301 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1997 Jeep Cherokee. (120 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1997 Jeep Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 370 kg more than 1997 Jeep Cherokee. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Jaguar XJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJ (541 Nm) has 346 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Jeep Cherokee. (195 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Jeep Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jaguar XJ | 1997 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | Jaguar | Jeep |
Model | XJ | Cherokee |
Year Released | 2002 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 2464 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 541 Nm | 195 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1430 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2580 mm |