2002 Jaguar XJ vs. 1998 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2002 Jaguar XJ is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJ (301 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1998 Jaguar XK. (290 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1998 Jaguar XK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 230 kg more than 1998 Jaguar XK. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJ (541 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Jaguar XK. (393 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Jaguar XK.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jaguar XJ | 1998 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Jaguar | Jaguar |
Model | XJ | XK |
Year Released | 2002 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 3995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 290 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 541 Nm | 393 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1570 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 3040 mm |