2002 Jaguar XJ vs. 2005 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJ (301 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 2005 Jeep Wrangler. (141 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2005 Jeep Wrangler. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 349 kg more than 2005 Jeep Wrangler. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Jaguar XJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJ (541 Nm) has 317 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Jeep Wrangler. (224 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Jaguar XJ | 2005 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Jaguar | Jeep |
| Model | XJ | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4196 cc | 2425 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 141 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 541 Nm | 224 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1451 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2380 mm |
