2002 Jaguar XJ vs. 2006 Nissan 350Z

To start off, 2006 Nissan 350Z is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 3,491 cc, 2006 Nissan 350Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan 350Z (300 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2002 Jaguar XJ. (240 HP @ 6350 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 2002 Jaguar XJ.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan 350Z (353 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jaguar XJ. (316 Nm @ 4350 RPM). This means 2006 Nissan 350Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jaguar XJ. 2002 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 2006 Nissan 350Z has manual transmission. 2006 Nissan 350Z will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Jaguar XJ 2006 Nissan 350Z
Make Jaguar Nissan
Model XJ 350Z
Year Released 2002 2006
Body Type Sedan Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3248 cc 3491 cc
Horse Power 240 HP 300 HP
Engine RPM 6350 RPM 6400 RPM
Torque 316 Nm 353 Nm
Torque RPM 4350 RPM 4800 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1710 kg 1710 kg
Vehicle Length 5160 mm 4320 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1820 mm
Vehicle Height 1310 mm 1340 mm
Wheelbase Size 2880 mm 2660 mm