2002 Jaguar XJ vs. 2010 GMC Acadia
To start off, 2010 GMC Acadia is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJ (301 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2010 GMC Acadia. (288 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2010 GMC Acadia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 GMC Acadia weights approximately 342 kg more than 2002 Jaguar XJ.
Because 2002 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 GMC Acadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJ (541 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 GMC Acadia. (366 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 GMC Acadia.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jaguar XJ | 2010 GMC Acadia | |
Make | Jaguar | GMC |
Model | XJ | Acadia |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 288 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 541 Nm | 366 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 2142 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 3020 mm |