2002 Jaguar XJ vs. 2010 Lincoln Town Car
To start off, 2010 Lincoln Town Car is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Lincoln Town Car is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJ (301 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 2010 Lincoln Town Car. (239 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2010 Lincoln Town Car. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Lincoln Town Car weights approximately 249 kg more than 2002 Jaguar XJ.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJ (541 Nm) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Lincoln Town Car. (389 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Lincoln Town Car.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jaguar XJ | 2010 Lincoln Town Car | |
Make | Jaguar | Lincoln |
Model | XJ | Town Car |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 239 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 541 Nm | 389 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 2049 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 3142 mm |