2002 Jaguar XJ vs. 2010 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2010 Lotus Evora is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Lotus Evora (400 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 2002 Jaguar XJ. (301 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 2002 Jaguar XJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Lotus Evora weights approximately 191 kg more than 2002 Jaguar XJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJ (541 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Lotus Evora. (459 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Lotus Evora.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Jaguar XJ | 2010 Lotus Evora | |
| Make | Jaguar | Lotus |
| Model | XJ | Evora |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4196 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 400 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 541 Nm | 459 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1991 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 3063 mm |
