2002 Jaguar XJ vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar XJ would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 342 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Because 2013 Mini Countryman is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Jaguar XJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJ (541 Nm) has 301 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (240 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman. 2002 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 2013 Mini Countryman has manual transmission. 2013 Mini Countryman will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jaguar XJ | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Jaguar | Mini |
Model | XJ | Countryman |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 541 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1458 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2595 mm |