2002 Jaguar XJ6 vs. 1999 Renault Zo
To start off, 2002 Jaguar XJ6 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Renault Zo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Renault Zo would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJ6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJ6 (240 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 1999 Renault Zo. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJ6 should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Zo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Renault Zo weights approximately 30 kg more than 2002 Jaguar XJ6.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJ6 (300 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Renault Zo. (260 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar XJ6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Renault Zo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Jaguar XJ6 | 1999 Renault Zo | |
| Make | Jaguar | Renault |
| Model | XJ6 | Zo |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2967 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 240 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 260 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1545 kg | 1575 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 83 L |
