2002 Jaguar XJ6 vs. 2008 Nissan Titan
To start off, 2008 Nissan Titan is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar XJ6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar XJ6 would be higher. At 5,552 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan Titan (317 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 2002 Jaguar XJ6. (240 HP @ 6800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 2002 Jaguar XJ6.
Because 2002 Jaguar XJ6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Jaguar XJ6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Titan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan Titan (522 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jaguar XJ6. (300 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 2008 Nissan Titan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jaguar XJ6.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jaguar XJ6 | 2008 Nissan Titan | |
Make | Jaguar | Nissan |
Model | XJ6 | Titan |
Year Released | 2002 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 5552 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 522 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 5710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 3560 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.7 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.3 L/100km | 19.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.5 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 106 L |