2002 Jaguar XJR vs. 1968 Triumph 1300

To start off, 2002 Jaguar XJR is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 1300 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJR (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 330 more horse power than 1968 Triumph 1300. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 1968 Triumph 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 750 kg more than 1968 Triumph 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2002 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Triumph 1300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJR (525 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 426 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Triumph 1300. (99 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Triumph 1300.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Jaguar XJR 1968 Triumph 1300
Make Jaguar Triumph
Model XJR 1300
Year Released 2002 1968
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4196 cc 1295 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 390 HP 60 HP
Engine RPM 6100 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 525 Nm 99 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 86.1 mm 73.7 mm
Engine Stroke Size 90.3 mm 76 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.1:1 9.0:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1665 kg 915 kg
Vehicle Length 5100 mm 3940 mm
Vehicle Width 1870 mm 1570 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 2910 mm 2460 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 85 L 53 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]