2002 Jaguar XJR vs. 1970 Mazda RX-2

To start off, 2002 Jaguar XJR is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJR (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 272 more horse power than 1970 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 1970 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 705 kg more than 1970 Mazda RX-2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJR (525 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 368 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Mazda RX-2. 2002 Jaguar XJR has automatic transmission and 1970 Mazda RX-2 has manual transmission. 1970 Mazda RX-2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Jaguar XJR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Jaguar XJR 1970 Mazda RX-2
Make Jaguar Mazda
Model XJR RX-2
Year Released 2002 1970
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4196 cc 2292 cc
Engine Type V dual-disk rotary
Horse Power 390 HP 118 HP
Engine RPM 6100 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 525 Nm 157 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.1:1 9.4:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1665 kg 960 kg
Vehicle Length 5100 mm 4150 mm
Vehicle Width 1870 mm 1580 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2910 mm 2480 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]