2002 Jaguar XJR vs. 1976 Volvo 66
To start off, 2002 Jaguar XJR is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJR (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 334 more horse power than 1976 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 1976 Volvo 66.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJR (525 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 431 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2002 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jaguar XJR | 1976 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
Model | XJR | 66 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 525 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.3 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1550 mm |