2002 Jaguar XJR vs. 1980 Zastava 132

To start off, 2002 Jaguar XJR is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJR (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 284 more horse power than 1980 Zastava 132. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 1980 Zastava 132. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 570 kg more than 1980 Zastava 132. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJR (525 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 382 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Zastava 132. (143 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Zastava 132. 2002 Jaguar XJR has automatic transmission and 1980 Zastava 132 has manual transmission. 1980 Zastava 132 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Jaguar XJR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: