2002 Jaguar XJR vs. 1983 Peugeot 305
To start off, 2002 Jaguar XJR is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Peugeot 305. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Peugeot 305 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJR (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 325 more horse power than 1983 Peugeot 305. (65 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 1983 Peugeot 305. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 680 kg more than 1983 Peugeot 305. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Peugeot 305, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJR (525 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 403 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Peugeot 305. (122 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2002 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Peugeot 305.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Jaguar XJR | 1983 Peugeot 305 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Peugeot |
| Model | XJR | 305 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4196 cc | 1905 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 65 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 525 Nm | 122 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90.3 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 23.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1665 kg | 985 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2630 mm |
