2002 Jaguar XJR vs. 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2002 Jaguar XJR is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 345 kg more than 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2002 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jaguar XJR | 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Jaguar | Oldsmobile |
Model | XJR | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2002 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1665 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2680 mm |