2002 Jaguar XJR vs. 2005 Lexus RX
To start off, 2005 Lexus RX is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJR (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 2005 Lexus RX. (230 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2005 Lexus RX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lexus RX weights approximately 179 kg more than 2002 Jaguar XJR.
Because 2005 Lexus RX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Jaguar XJR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Lexus RX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJR (525 Nm) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Lexus RX. (328 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Lexus RX.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jaguar XJR | 2005 Lexus RX | |
Make | Jaguar | Lexus |
Model | XJR | RX |
Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 3310 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 230 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 525 Nm | 328 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.3 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 10.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1665 kg | 1844 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.6 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.3 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 73 L |