2002 Jaguar XJR vs. 2010 Citroen C4
To start off, 2010 Citroen C4 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJR (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 252 more horse power than 2010 Citroen C4. (138 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2010 Citroen C4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 311 kg more than 2010 Citroen C4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJR (525 Nm) has 325 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Citroen C4. (200 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Citroen C4.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jaguar XJR | 2010 Citroen C4 | |
Make | Jaguar | Citroen |
Model | XJR | C4 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 525 Nm | 200 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.3 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 11.0:1 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 5.9 seconds | 10.1 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1665 kg | 1354 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.3 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 60 L |