2002 Jaguar XJR vs. 2010 Kia Magentis

To start off, 2010 Kia Magentis is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJR (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 205 more horse power than 2010 Kia Magentis. (185 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2010 Kia Magentis. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 100 kg more than 2010 Kia Magentis. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2002 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Kia Magentis, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJR (525 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 278 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Kia Magentis. (247 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Kia Magentis.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Jaguar XJR 2010 Kia Magentis
Make Jaguar Kia
Model XJR Magentis
Year Released 2002 2010
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4196 cc 2655 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 390 HP 185 HP
Engine RPM 6100 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 525 Nm 247 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 86.1 mm 86.7 mm
Engine Stroke Size 90.3 mm 75 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.1:1 10.4:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1665 kg 1565 kg
Vehicle Length 5100 mm 4740 mm
Vehicle Width 1870 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 2910 mm 2730 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 12.3 L/100km 9.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 85 L 62 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]