2002 Jaguar XJR vs. 2012 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2012 Fisker Karma is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar XJR would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fisker Karma weights approximately 875 kg more than 2002 Jaguar XJR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jaguar XJR | 2012 Fisker Karma | |
Make | Jaguar | Fisker |
Model | XJR | Karma |
Year Released | 2002 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1665 kg | 2540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4996 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1984 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1331 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3160 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 36 L |