2002 Jaguar XJR vs. 2012 Nissan Leaf
To start off, 2012 Nissan Leaf is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar XJR would be higher.
Because 2002 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Leaf, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Jaguar XJR | 2012 Nissan Leaf | |
| Make | Jaguar | Nissan |
| Model | XJR | Leaf |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4445 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1549 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 9 L/100km | 2.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 18.6 L/100km | 2.2 L/100km |
