2002 Jaguar XJR vs. 2013 Audi A5
To start off, 2013 Audi A5 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJR (390 HP) has 182 more horse power than 2013 Audi A5. (208 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2013 Audi A5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 100 kg more than 2013 Audi A5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJR (525 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Audi A5. (350 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Audi A5.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Jaguar XJR | 2013 Audi A5 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Audi |
| Model | XJR | A5 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4196 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | boxer |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 208 HP |
| Torque | 525 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 82.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90.3 mm | 92.8 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1665 kg | 1565 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4625 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1854 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1383 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2751 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 9 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 18.6 L/100km | 10.1 L/100km |
