2002 Jaguar XJR vs. 2013 Chevrolet Silverado
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Silverado is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 4,800 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Silverado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJR (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2013 Chevrolet Silverado. (298 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2013 Chevrolet Silverado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Silverado weights approximately 362 kg more than 2002 Jaguar XJR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJR (525 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Chevrolet Silverado. (414 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2002 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Chevrolet Silverado.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jaguar XJR | 2013 Chevrolet Silverado | |
Make | Jaguar | Chevrolet |
Model | XJR | Silverado |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 4800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 298 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 525 Nm | 414 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.3 mm | 83 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 4-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1665 kg | 2027 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 5222 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1875 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3023 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9 L/100km | 10.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.6 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 98 L |