2002 Jaguar XK vs. 1974 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2002 Jaguar XK is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,996 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XK (290 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 1974 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1974 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XK weights approximately 325 kg more than 1974 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XK (393 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2002 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Jaguar XK | 1974 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Triumph |
| Model | XK | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3996 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 290 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 393 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1245 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2700 mm |
