2002 Jaguar XK vs. 1993 Mazda MX-3
To start off, 2002 Jaguar XK is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mazda MX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mazda MX-3 would be higher. At 3,996 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Mazda MX-3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jaguar XK | 1993 Mazda MX-3 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | XK | MX-3 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1993 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3996 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2460 mm |