2002 Jaguar XK vs. 2013 Mazda CX-5

To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-5 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,996 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XK (290 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 2013 Mazda CX-5. (153 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda CX-5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XK weights approximately 82 kg more than 2013 Mazda CX-5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2002 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XK (393 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda CX-5. (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda CX-5.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Jaguar XK 2013 Mazda CX-5
Make Jaguar Mazda
Model XK CX-5
Year Released 2002 2013
Body Type Coupe Crossover
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3996 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 290 HP 153 HP
Engine RPM 6100 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 393 Nm 203 Nm
Torque RPM 4250 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 86 mm 83 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86 mm 91 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.7:1 13.0 : 1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1570 kg 1488 kg
Vehicle Length 4770 mm 4555 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 2165 mm
Vehicle Height 1300 mm 1710 mm
Wheelbase Size 3040 mm 2700 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 L 56 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]