2002 Jaguar XK vs. 2013 Suzuki SX4
To start off, 2013 Suzuki SX4 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar XK would be higher.
Because 2013 Suzuki SX4 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Suzuki SX4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jaguar XK | 2013 Suzuki SX4 | |
Make | Jaguar | Suzuki |
Model | XK | SX4 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 291 HP | 0 HP |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |