2002 Jaguar XK8 vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2002 Jaguar XK8 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XK8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XK8 (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 211 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XK8 should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XK8 weights approximately 564 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XK8 (420 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 262 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Jaguar XK8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jaguar XK8 | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Jaguar | Triumph |
Model | XK8 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1734 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 64 L |