2002 Jaguar XK8 vs. 1965 Volkswagen 1500
To start off, 2002 Jaguar XK8 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Volkswagen 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Volkswagen 1500 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XK8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XK8 (300 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 248 more horse power than 1965 Volkswagen 1500. (52 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XK8 should accelerate faster than 1965 Volkswagen 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XK8 weights approximately 755 kg more than 1965 Volkswagen 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Jaguar XK8 | 1965 Volkswagen 1500 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Volkswagen |
| Model | XK8 | 1500 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1965 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1493 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 52 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1685 kg | 930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4200 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.3 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 40 L |
