2002 Jaguar XK8 vs. 1980 Volvo 260

To start off, 2002 Jaguar XK8 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XK8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XK8 (300 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 219 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 260. (81 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XK8 should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 260. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XK8 weights approximately 235 kg more than 1980 Volvo 260. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XK8 (420 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 280 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 260. (140 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2002 Jaguar XK8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 260.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Jaguar XK8 1980 Volvo 260
Make Jaguar Volvo
Model XK8 260
Year Released 2002 1980
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4195 cc 2383 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 300 HP 81 HP
Engine RPM 6100 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 420 Nm 140 Nm
Torque RPM 4100 RPM 2800 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 11.0:1 23.5:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1685 kg 1450 kg
Vehicle Length 4770 mm 4890 mm
Vehicle Height 1300 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2590 mm 2660 mm