2002 Jaguar XK8 vs. 2011 Acura RL
To start off, 2011 Acura RL is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar XK8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar XK8 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XK8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 300 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Acura RL weights approximately 167 kg more than 2002 Jaguar XK8.
Because 2011 Acura RL is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Jaguar XK8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Acura RL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XK8 (420 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Acura RL. (367 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2002 Jaguar XK8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Acura RL.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jaguar XK8 | 2011 Acura RL | |
Make | Jaguar | Acura |
Model | XK8 | RL |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 367 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1685 kg | 1852 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4971 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1453 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2799 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.3 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.7 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 73 L |